References

  1. Hyson JM Jr. Amalgam: Its history and perils. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006 Mar;34(3):215-29.
  2. The International Oral Lichen Planus Support Group. Texas A&M College of Dentistry, Dallas, TX. Accessed February 22, 2019.
  3. Al‐Hashimi I, Schifter M, Lockhart B, et al. Oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Mar;103 Suppl:S25.e1-12. Epub 2007 Jan 29. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.001.
  4. Hoffmann-Axthelm W. History of dentistry. Quintessence, Chicago, IL. 1981; pp:43,156.
  5. ADA Statement on Dental Amalgam. Accessed February 22, 2019.
  6. Lynch CD, Opdam NJ, Hickel R, et al. Guidance on posterior resin composites: Academy of Operative Dentistry - European Section. J Dent. 2014 Apr;42(4):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
  7. Lynch CD, Farnell DJJ, Stanton H, et al. No more amalgams: Use of amalgam and amalgam alternative materials in primary dental care. Br Dent J. 2018 Jul 27;225(2):171-176. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.538.
  8. ADA. Dental Amalgam: What Others Say. Updated April 2016. Accessed February 22, 2019.
  9. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. Amalgam Safety Update. September 2010. Accessed February 22, 2019.
  10. Khwaja MA, Nawaz S, Ali SW. Mercury exposure in the work place and human health: dental amalgam use in dentistry at dental teaching institutions and private dental clinics in selected cities of Pakistan. Rev Environ Health. 2016 Mar;31(1):21-7. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2015-0058.
  11. Björkman L, Sjursen TT, Dalen K, et al. Long term changes in health complaints after removal of amalgam restorations. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017 Apr;75(3):208-219. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2016.1278262. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
  12. Canadian Dental Association Position Paper on Amalgam. Revised March 2014. Accessed February 22, 2019.
  13. Sharma R, Handa S, De D, et al. Role of dental restoration materials in oral mucosal lichenoid lesions. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2015 Sep-Oct;81(5):478-84. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.162341.
  14. Tiwari SM, Gebauer K, Frydrych AM, et al. Dental patch testing in patients with undifferentiated oral lichen planus. Australas J Dermatol. 2018 Aug;59(3):188-193. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12692. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
  15. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. About Dental Amalgam Fillings. Updated: 05 Dec 2017. Accessed February 22, 2019.
  16. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. FDA News Release. FDA and EPA issue final fish consumption advice. 18 Jan 2017. Accessed February 22, 2019.
  17. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. National Center for Toxicological Research. White Paper: FDA Update/Review of Potential Adverse Health Risks Associated with Exposure to Mercury in Dental Amalgam. August 2006. Accessed February 22, 2019.
  18. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. National Center for Toxicological Research. White Paper: FDA Update/Review of Potential Adverse Health Risks Associated with Exposure to Mercury in Dental Amalgam. July 2009. Accessed February 22, 2019.
  19. Bengtsson UG, Hylander LD. Increased mercury emissions from modern dental amalgams. Biometals. 2017 Apr;30(2):277-283. doi: 10.1007/s10534-017-0004-3. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
  20. Aaseth J, Hilt B, Bjørklund G. Mercury exposure and health impacts in dental personnel. Environ Res. 2018 Jul;164:65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.02.019. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
  21. The International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology. Accessed February 22, 2019.
  22. California Dental Association. Dental Amalgam: Public Health and the Environment. July 2016. Accessed February 22, 2018.
  23. California Code of Regulations Title 22 Section 66273.33(c)(4)(A). Accessed February 22, 2019.
  24. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. About Dental Amalgam Fillings. Updated: 05 Dec 2017. Accessed February 22, 2019.
  25. Dental Board of California. Dental Materials Fact Sheet. May 2004. Accessed February 22, 2019.
  26. Edlich RF, Cochran AA, Cross CL, et al. Legislation and informed consent brochures for dental patients receiving amalgam restorations. Int J Toxicol. 2008 Jul-Aug;27(4):313-6. doi: 10.1080/10915810802366851.
  27. Cariccio VL, Samà A, Bramanti P, et al. Mercury Involvement in Neuronal Damage and in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019 Feb;187(2):341-356. doi: 10.1007/s12011-018-1380-4. Epub 2018 May 18.
  28. Martin MD, Woods JS. The safety of dental amalgam in children. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2006 Nov;5(6):773-81. doi: 10.1517/14740338.5.6.773.
  29. Martin MD, Bajet D, Woods JS, et al. Detection of dental composite and sealant resin components in urine. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics. 2005 Apr;99(4):429. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.02.014. Accessed February 22, 2019.
  30. Eltahlah D, Lynch CD, Chadwick BL, et al. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations. J Dent. 2018 May;72:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
  31. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, et al. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res. 2010 Oct;89(10):1063-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034510376071. Epub 2010 Jul 26.

Additional Resources

  • No Additional Resources Available